<93r>
Irenæus introduced an opinion that the Apocalype
|s|e
was writ in the time of Domitian; but he also
postponed the writing of some others of the sacred
books, and was to place the Apocalypse after
them: he might perhaps have heard from his
master Polycarp that he had received this book
from Iohn about the time of Domitians death; or
indeed Iohn might himself at that time have made
a new publication of it, from whence Irenæus might <f. 91v> imagin it was then but newly written. Eusebius
in \his/
Chronicle and Ecclesiastical History follows Irenæus; but afterwards
a
3
in his Evangelical Demonstrations, he
conjoyns the D[illeg]
banishment of Iohn into Patmos, with
the deaths of Peter and Paul: and so does
b
4
Tertullian
and Pseudo-Prochorus, and the first author, whoever he
was, of that very ancient fable that Iohn was put
by Nero into a vessel of hot oyle, and coming out
unhurt, was banished by him into Patmos. Tho this
story be no more than a fiction, yet was it founded on
a tradition of the first Churches, that Iohn was banishd
into Patmos in the daies of Nero. Epiphanius repre-
sents the Gospel of Iohn as written in the time of Domitian
and the Apocalypse even before Nero's.
c
5
Arethas in the
beginning of his Commentary quotes the opinion of Irenæus
from Eusebius, but follows it not: for he afterwards
affirms the Apocalypse was writ before the destruction
of Ierusalem, and that former commentators had expoun-
ded the sixth seal of that destruction.6
Irenæus has set on foot an opinion that ye
Apocalyps
was writ in the reign
7
of Domitian: but he postpones the
writing of other sacred books & was to place the Apoca-
lyps after them. \Perhaps \his master/ Polycarp might say he had it from Iohn in ye
end of Domatian's reign \or Iohn might at that time put out a new edition of it/ & I
[illeg]
|ren|æus \might/ thence frame a notion of its being written then at that time./ Eusebius in his Chronicle & Ecclesiastical
History follows Irenæus: b
|. B|ut afterwards
a
8
in his Evangelical
Demonstrations he conjoyns the banishment of Iohn into Patmos
with the death of Peth
|e|r & Paul: & so does
b
9
Tertullian
& Pseudo-prochorus & whoever \he/ was the first author of that
very ancient story fable that Iohn was put by Nero into
a vessel of hot oyle & coming out without hurt was
banished by him into Patmos. \Tho this be but a fiction yet it was founded in a tradition of the first Churches that Iohn was banished into Patmos in Nero's reign Epiphanius represents the Gospel of Iohn written in
Domatian's reign & the
Apocalyps before Nero's./ Arethas in the beginning
of his Commentary mentions out of Eusebius the opinion
of Irenæus but follows it not: For
c
10
afterwards (he affirms
that the Apocalyps was writ before the destruction of
Ierusalem & that former Commentators expounded the sixt
seal of that destruction. |
✜
|
11
With the opinion of the first
Commentators agrees the tradition of ye
Churches of Syria,
conserved
|preserved|
\to this day/ in the little of the Syriac Version of ye
Apo-
calyps
|se|, wch
\title/ is this: The Revelation of Iesus Christ wch
Io
wch
was made to Iohn the Evangelist by God in ye
Island Patmos, into wch
he was banished by Nero the Cæsar.
The same is confirmed by a story told by Eusebius12
out of
Clemens Alexandrinus, & others anc
|t|ient authors, concerning
a youth, whom Iohn sometime after his return from
Patmos committed to ye
care of a certain Bishop of a
certain city. The Bishop educated, instructed, & at length
baptized him, but then remitted of his care. The young man
thereupon by degrees got into ill company, & began \by degrees/ first to
revell & grow vitious, & then to abuse & spoile those he
met in the night; & at length grew so desperate, that his
companions turning a band of High-way men, made him their
Capitain &, saith Chrysostom, 13
he continued their capitain for
a long time. At length Iohn returning to that city, &
hearing what was done, rode to the Thief; &, then the
Thief out of reverence to his old Master fled, rode after
him, recalled him, & restored him to ye
Church. This is a story
1
Then in the next leaf.
2
running title observations &c.
3
a Dem. Evang. l. 3
4
b Parnetii Not Vid. Parnetium in notis ad Tertull. de Præscriptionibus. n. 215. & Hieron. l. 1. contra Iovinianum c. 14. Edit. Erasmi
5
c Areth. c. 18. 19.
6
With &c. ✜ pag. 1.
7
time/
8
a Dem. Evang. l. 3
9
b
Vide Pamellium in
notis ad Tertul. de Præscriptionibus n 215 et Hieron l. 1 cont. Iovinian c 14. Edit Erasmi
10
c Areth. cap. 18, 19.
11
Br.
12
Euseb Hist. Eccl. l 3. c 23
13
Chrysost. ad Theodorum lapsum.