<48v>
☞ Note yt
if there happen to bee in any equation either a \fraction or/ surde quantity
or a Mechanichall one, (i:e: wch
cannot bee Geometrically computed, but is
expressed by ye
[illeg]
\area/ or length or gravity or content of some curve line or sollid, &c)
To find in what proportion they
\unknowne quantitys/ increase or decrease doe thus. |1| Take two letters
ye
one (as ξ) to signify yt
quantity, ye
other (as
χ
π) its motion of increase or
decrease: And making an equation betwixt
yt
|
ye
| letter (ξ) & ye
quantity signifyed
by it, find thereby (by prop 7 if ye
Equation
\quantity/ bee Geometricall, or by some other
meanes if it bee mechanicall) ye
valor of ye
other letter (π). |2| Then substi-
tuting ye
letter (ξ) signifying yt
quantity, into its place in ye
maine Equation
esteeme yt
letter (ξ) as an unknowne quantity & performe ye
worke of
seaventh proposition; & into ye
resulting Equation instead of those letters
ξ & π substitute theire valors. And soe you have ye
Equation required.
Example 1. To find p & q ye
motions of x & y whose relation is, .
first suppose , Or . & thereby find π
ye
motion of ξ, viz:
(by prop 7) . Or . Secondly in ye
Equation ,
writing ξ in stead of , the result is , whereby find ye
relation of ye
motions p, q, &
π: viz (by prop 7) . In wch
Equation instead of ξ
& π writing theire valors, ye
result is, . wch
was required \to/.
[wch
equation multiplyed by , is . & in stead of
, writing its valor , it is . Or . Which [sic]
Which conclusion will also bee found by taking ye
surde quantity out ye
given Equation
for both parts being squared it is . & therefore (by prop 7) ,
as before.]
☞ Note also yt
it may bee more convenient \(setting all ye
termes on one side of ye
Equation)/ to put
[illeg]
every fractionall, irrationall
& mechanicall terme, as also ye
summe of ye
rationall termes, equall severally to
some letter: & then to find ye
motions corresponding to each letter of those
letters ye
sume of wch
motions is ye
Equation required.
Example ye
2d. If is ye
relation twixt x & y, whose motions
p & q are required. I make ; ; & . & ye
motions of τ, φ, &
ξ being called β, γ, & δ; ye
first Equation
[illeg]
, gives (by prop 7) . ye
second , gives ; Or .
& ye
Third , gives, ; Or .
Lastly , is ye
Equation sought.
Example 3d. If . be=y. & ye
superficies abc=z
suppose yt
ax+xz−y3
, is ye
relation twixt x, y & z,
whose motions are p, q, & r: & yt
p & q are desired. The Equation
gives (by prop 7), . Now drawing
dh∥ab⊥ad=1−bh. I consider ye
superficies abhd=ab×bh=x×1=x, &
abd=z doe increase in ye
proportion of bh to bc: yt is, 1∶∷p∶r.
Or . Which valor of r being substituted into ye
Equation
, gives . wch
was required.
How to proceede in other cases (as when there are cube rootes, surde denominators, rootes
within rootes (as &c: in the equation) may bee easily bee deduced from what
[ha]th bee[n] already said.